Gastando más y produciendo menos: un análisis de los tribunales regionales federales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v22i2.2867Palabras clave:
administración pública, Tribunales Regionales Federales, eficiencia, índice de productividad magistradaResumen
La eficiencia de la administración pública es una discusión que generalmente está vinculada a sesgos ideológicos sobre el mejor modelo de Estado. Esperando mantenerse alejado de este obstáculo (ideología) para el enfoque científico, el presente trabajo comenzó con la intención de evaluar la eficiencia de los Tribunales Regionales Federales (TRF), mediante el estudio de los gastos y la productividad (de magistrados y servidores) de estos Tribunales, de 2012 a 2016. Utilizando un enfoque cuantitativo, con un análisis descriptivo y exploratorio de los datos, fue posible concluir que, a pesar del crecimiento ininterrumpido en el gasto judicial, la eficiencia (recesiones) del TRF disminuyó en el período evaluado. También se puede concluir que, durante el período evaluado, la contratación de más jueces y funcionarios redujo los índices de productividad específicos de los magistrados y funcionarios de los Tribunales Regionales Federales.
Citas
BAKER, S. Should We Pay Federal Circuit Judges More. Boston University Law Review, [s.l.], v. 88, n. 63, Boston, 2008.
BANKER, R. D. Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation. Management Science, [s.l.], v. 39, n. 10, p. 1265-73, 1993. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1265
BEENSTOCK, M.; HAITOVSKY, Yoel. Does the appointment of judges increase the output of the judiciary? International Review of Law and Economics, [s.l.], v. 24, n. 3, p. 351-69, 2004. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2004.10.006
BHATTACHARYA, M.; SMYTH, R. The determinants of judicial prestige and influence: some empirical evidence from the high court of Australia. The Journal of Legal Studies, Chicago, v. 30, n. 1, p. 223-52, 2001. Doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/468117
BINDER, S. A.; MALTZMAN, F. Advice and dissent: the struggle to shape the federal judiciary. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2009. 198 p. Doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctt6wpgnk
BINFORD, P. C.; GREENE, W. W.; TAYLOR, H. A. Seeking best practices among intermediate courts of appeal: a nascent journey. Justice System Journal, [s.l.], v. 2, n. 9, p. 37-119, 2007.
CALEMAN, S. M. Q.; MONTEIRO, G. F. A. Should I go to court? – an assessment of the role of the judiciary in disputes between cattle raisers and meatpackers in Brazil. RAUSP Management Journal, São Paulo, v. 48, n. 2, p. 208-21, 2013. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5700/rausp1083
CASTRO, M. F.; GUCCIO, C. Searching for the source of technical inefficiency in italian judicial districts: an empirical investigation. European Journal of Law and Economics, [Springer], v. 38, n. 3, p. 369-91, 2014.
CAUTHEN, J. N. G.; LATZER, B. Why so long? Explaining processing time in capital appeals. Justice System Journal, [s.l.], v. 29, n. 3, p. 298-312, 2008.
CECIL, J. S. Administration of Justice in a large appellate court: the ninth circuit innovations project. Federal Judicial Center, Washington, v. 85, n. 9, p. 37-119, 1985.
CHARNES, A.; COOPER, W. W.; RHODES, E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, [s.l.], v. 2, n. 6, p. 429-44, 1978. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
CHEMIN, M. Do judiciaries matter for development? – evidence from India. Journal of Comparative Economics, [s.l.], v. 37, n. 2, p. 230-50, 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2009.02.001
CHOI, S. J.; GULATI, M.; POSNER, E. A. What do Federal District judges want? – an analysis of publications, citations, and reversals. The Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, Oxford, [s.l.], v. 28, n. 3, p. 518-49, 2011.
CHRISTENSEN, R. K.; SZMER, J. Examining the efficiency of the U.S. courts of appeals: pathologies and prescriptions. International Review of Law and Economics, v. 32, n. 1, p. 30-37, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2011.12.004
COHEN, J. M. Inside appellate courts: the impact of court organization on judicial decision making in the United States courts of appeals. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2009.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA [CNJ]. Justiça em números: ano-base 2017. Brasília: CNJ, 2018. Disponível em: http://www.cnj.jus.br/. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2020.
COOTER, R. D. The objectives of private and public judges. Public Choice, v. 1, n. 41, p. 41-107. 1983.
FALAVIGNA, G.; IPPOLITI, R.; RAMELLO, G. B. DEA-Based malmquist productivity indexes for understanding courts reform. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, [s.l.], v. 62, p. 31-43, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.07.001
FARRELL, M. J. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, [Wiley], v. 120, n. 3, p. 253-90, 1957. Doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2343100
HEINEN, L. R. A Análise Econômica do Direito de Richard Posner e os pressupostos irrealistas da economia neoclássica. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DO CONPEDI/UFF, 21., 31 out., 1º a 3 nov. 2012. Anais [...]. Niterói: UFF, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.publicadireito.com.br/artigos/?cod=991c0955da231335. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2016.
HETTINGER, V. A.; LINDQUIST, S. A.; MARTINEK, W. L. Judging on a collegial court: influences on federal appellate decision making. Virginia: University of Virginia Press, 2007.
INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA ECONÔMICA APLICADA [IPEA]. O crescimento insustentável dos gastos com previdência e pessoal. Carta de Conjuntura n. 38, fev. 2018. [Por Ernesto Lozardo, Claudio Hamilton e Rogério Nagamine]. Disponível em: https://www.ipea.gov.br/cartadeconjuntura/index.php/2018/02/o-crescimento-insustentavel-dos-gastos-com-previdencia-e-pessoal/. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2020.
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND. Brazil: Fiscal transparency evaluation. Report n. 17/104. Washington: IMF, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.imf.org/external/index.htm. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2020.
KITTELSEN, S. A. C.; FØRSUND, F. R. Efficiency analysis of norwegian district courts. Journal of Productivity Analysis, v. 3, n. 3, p. 277-306, 1992. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158357
KLEIN, D.; MORRISROE, D. The prestige and influence of individual judges on the U.S. courts of appeals. The Journal of Legal Studies, Chicago, v. 28, n. 2, p. 371-91, 1999. Doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/468055
LANDES, W. M.; LESSIG, L.; SOLIMINE, M. E. Judicial influence: a citation analysis of federal courts of appeals judges. The Journal of Legal Studies, [s.l.], v. 27, n. 2, p. 271-332, 1988. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/468022
LEWIN, A. Y.; MOREY, R. C.; COOK, T. J. Evaluating the administrative efficiency of courts. Omega, [s.l.], v. 10, n. 4, p. 401-11, 1982. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(82)90019-6
LINDQUIST, S. A.; MARTINEK, W. L.; HETTINGER, V. A. Split decisions: explaining mixed outcomes on the United States courts of appeals. Law and Society Review, [s.l.], v. 41, n. 2, p. 429-56. 2007.
MARQUESI, D. L’enforcement Delle Regole – problemi di efficienza della giustizia civile, riforme intraprese e riforme possibili. ISAE-Roma, [s.l.], v. 24, n. 3, p. 351-69, 2008.
PEYRACHE, A.; ZAGO, A. Large courts, small justice! – the inefficiency and the optimal structure of the italian justice sector. Omega, [s.l.], v. 64, p. 42-56, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.11.002
POSNER, R. What do judges and justices maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does. Supreme Court Economic Review, Chicago, v. 3, p. 1-44, 1993.
POSNER, R. A. The federal courts: challenge and reform. Edição revisada. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.
RUBIN, P. The evolution of efficient common law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007.
SILVA, G. R.; STAACK, A. L., Análise econômica do direito por Richard Posner e os direitos sociais: uma abordagem cruzada. Revista de Direito, Economia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Florianópolis, v. 3, n. 1, 2017.
SIMAR, L.; WILSON, P. W. Estimation and Inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, [Elsevier], v. 136, n. 1, p. 31-64, 2007.
TAHA, A. Publish or Paris? – evidence of how judges allocate their time. American Law and Economics Review, [s.l.], v. 6, n. 11, p. 1-27, 2004.
TOMIO, F. R. L.; ROBL FILHO, I. N. Accountability e independência judiciais: uma análise da competência do Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ). Revista de Sociologia e Política, Curitiba, v. 21, n. 45, p. 29-46, 2013.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
