Greenhouse gas emissions from Brazilian swine production: a systematic review by Proknow-C method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20435/multi.v29i73.4560Keywords:
Brazilian pig production, systematic review, weaned piglet, greenhouse gas emissions, life cycle assessmentAbstract
Research on monogastric production and greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions often relies on small sample sizes compared to the national scope of the activity in their countries of origin. This systematic review aimed to assess the use of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Brazilian swine production and its GHG emissions. The Proknow-C method was applied to quantify research and a similarity analysis was performed using the VoSViewer® software to systematically evaluate the content. The descriptors were led by Life cycle assessment”, followed by “Pig Production”, “Swine Production”, “Greenhouse Gas Emissions”, “Piglet Production”, and “Brazil”. Brazil stands out in studies on environmental impacts and the development of mitigation technologies, but there is still a lack of results on the products of these technologies. A trend has been observed to study the impact of feeding and waste treatment systems on GHG emissions. Through the selected descriptors, it was observed that there are still gaps when it comes to life cycle assessment in national pig farming.
References
ALI, B. M.; BERENTSEN, P. B. M.; BASTIAANSEN, J. W. M.; A. LANSINK, A. O. A stochastic bio-economic pig farm model to assess the impact of innovations on farm performance. Animal, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 4, p. 819-30, 2018. DOI: 10.1017/s1751731117002531
ALI, B. M.; ZANTEN, H. V.; BERENTSEN, P.; BASTIAANSEN, J. W. M.; BIKKER, P.; LANSINK, A. O. Environmental and economic impacts of using co-products in the diets of finishing pigs in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, [S. l.], v. 162, p. 247-59, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.041
ALMEIDA, C. M. V. B.; FRUGOLI, A. D.; AGOSTINHO, F.; LIU, G. Y.; GIANNETTI, B. F. Integrating or Des-integrating agribusiness systems: Outcomes of emergy evaluation. Science of The Total Environment, [S. l.], v. 729, p. 138733, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138733
ANDRETTA, I.; HAUSCHILD, L.; KIPPER, M.; PIRES, P. G. S.; POMAR, C. Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production. Animal, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 9, p. 1990-998, 2018. DOI: 10.1017/s1751731117003159
ANDRETTA, I.; HICKMANN, F. M. W.; REMUS, A.; FRANCESCHI, C. H.; MARIANI, A. B.; ORSO, C.; KIPPER, M.; LÉTOURNEAU-MONTMINY, M.-P.; POMAR, C. Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Production: Insights from a Systematic Review. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, [S. l.], v. 8, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.750733
CADÉRO, A.; AUBRY, A.; DOURMAD, J. Y.; SALAÜN, Y.; GARCIA-LAUNAY, F. Effects of interactions between feeding practices, animal health and farm infrastructure on technical, economic and environmental performances of a pig-fattening unit. Animal, [S. l.], v. 14, p. s348-s359, 2020. DOI: 10.1017/s1751731120000300
CHERUBINI, E.; FRANCO, D.; ZANGHELINI1, G. M.; SOARES, S. R. Uncertainty in LCA case study due to allocation approaches and life cycle impact assessment methods. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, [S. l.], v. 23, n. 10, p. 2055-70, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-017-1432-6
CHERUBINI, E.; ZANGHELINI, G. M.; ALVARENGA, R. A. F.; FRANCO, D.; SOARES, S. R. Life cycle assessment of swine production in Brazil: a comparison of four manure management systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, [S. l.], v. 87, p. 68-77, 2015a. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.035
CHERUBINI, E.; ZANGHELINI, G.; TAVARES, J.; BELETTINI, F.; SOARES, S. The finishing stage in swine production: influences of feed composition on carbon footprint. Environment, Development and Sustainability, [S. l.], v. 17, n. 6, p. 1313-328, 2015b. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-014-9607-9
ENSSLIN, L. et al. ProKnow-C, Knowledge Development Process–Constructivist: processo técnico com patente de registro pendente junto ao INPI. Rio de Janeiro: [S. n.], 2010.
GARCIA-LAUNAY, F.; VAN DER WERF, H. M. G.; NGUYEN, T. T. H.; LE TUTOUR, L.; DOURMAD, J. Y. Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in pig production using Life Cycle Assessment. Livestock Science, [S. l.], v. 161, p. 158-75, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.11.027
GEREMIAS, R.; NORDBERG, Å. Climate impact assessment of a pig manure storage system substituted with anaerobic digestion - a case study in Santa Catarina, Brazil. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, [S. l.], v. 23, n. 5/6, p. 414, 2020. DOI: 10.1504/ijetm.2020.114141
HOLLAS, C. E.; RODRIGUES. H. C.; BOLSAN A. C.; VENTURIN, B.; BORTOLI, M.; ANTES, F. G.; STEINMETZ, R. L. R.; KUNZ, A. Swine manure treatment technologies as drivers for circular economy in agribusiness: A techno-economic and life cycle assessment approach. Science of The Total Environment, [S. l.], v. 857, p. 159494, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159494
INTERNATIONAL PANEL OF CLIMATE CHANGE [IPCC]. History. IPCC, [s. l.], 2023. Disponível em: https://www.ipcc.ch/about/history/. Acesso em: 5 fev. 2023.
KNAPCZYK, A.; FRANCIK, F.; PEDRYC, N. HEBDA, T. Bibliometric analysis of research trends in engineering for rural development. In: INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 17., 2018, [S. l.]. Proceedings […]. [S. l.]: Latvia University of Agriculture, 2018. DOI: 10.22616/erdev2018.17.n389
LACERDA, R. T. O.; ENSSLIN, L.; ENSSLIN, S. R. Uma análise bibliométrica da literatura sobre estratégia e avaliação de desempenho. Gestão & Produção, São Carlos, v. 19, n. 1, p. 59-78, 2012. DOI: 10.1590/s0104-530x2012000100005
LINHARES, J. E.; PESSA, S. L. R.; BORTOLUZZI, S. C.; LUZ, R. P. Capacidade para o trabalho e envelhecimento funcional: análise Sistêmica da Literatura utilizando o PROKNOW-C (Knowledge Development Process - Constructivist). Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Rio de Janeiro, v. 24, n. 1, p. 53-66, jan. 2019. DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232018241.00112017
MCAULIFFE, G. A.; TAKAHASHI, T.; MOGENSEN, L.; HERMANSEN, J. E.; SAGE, C. L.; CHAPMAN, D. V.; LEE, M. R. F. Environmental trade-offs of pig production systems under varied operational efficiencies. Journal of Cleaner Production, [s. l.], v. 165, p. 1163-173, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.191.
MONTEIRO, A. N. T. R.; DOURMAD, J.-Y.; POZZA, P. C. Life cycle assessment as a tool to evaluate the impact of reducing crude protein in pig diets. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 47, n. 6, 2017. DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20161029
MONTEIRO, A. N. T. R.; FACHINELLO, M. R.; DIAZ-HUEPA, L. M. 509 Environmental impact based on life cycle assessment of starting pig production receiving diets with reduced crude protein content. Journal of Animal Science, [S. l.], v. 95, suppl. 4, p. 248, 2017. DOI: 10.2527/asasann.2017.509.
MONTEIRO, A. N. T. R; GARCIA-LAUNAY, F.; BROSSARD, L.; WILFART, A.; DOURMAD, J.-Y. Effect of feeding strategy on environmental impacts of pig fattening in different contexts of production: evaluation through life cycle assessment1. Journal of Animal Science, [S. l.], v. 94, n. 11, p. 4832-847, 2016. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016-0529
PIETRAMALE, R. T. R.; CALDARA, F. R.; BARBOSA, D. K.; ROSA, C. O. How much the reproductive losses of sows can be impacting the carbon footprint in swine production? Livestock Science, [S. l.], v. 250, n. 1, p. 104594, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104594
RECKMANN, K.; TRAULSEN, I.; KRIETER, J. Environmental Impact Assessment – methodology with special emphasis on European pork production. Journal of Environmental Management, [S. l.], v. 107, p. 102-109, set. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.015.
SHAH, S. H. H.; LEI, S.; ALI, M.; DORONIN, D.; HUSSAIN, S. T. Prosumption: bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes, [S. l.], v. 49, n. 3, p. 1020-45. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/k-12-2018-0696.
ZIRA, S. RYDHMER, L.; IVARSSON, E.; HOFFMANN, R.; RÖÖS, E. A life cycle sustainability assessment of organic and conventional pork supply chains in Sweden. Sustainable Production and Consumption, [S. l.], v. 28, p. 21-38, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.028
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rita Therezinha Rolim Pietramale, Rosa, C. O., Santos - Mantovani, G. V., Ruviaro, C. F.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os artigos publicados na Revista Multitemas têm acesso aberto (Open Access) sob a licença Creative Commons Attribution, que permite uso, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, sem restrições desde que o trabalho original seja corretamente citado.
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.